National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's SKA Brasil U20 or Oeste U20 that keep their silverware dream alive.
It's no vacation for neither SKA Brasil U20 nor Oeste U20 as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
SKA Brasil U20 form and stats
Action has already taken place for Brasil in Sao Paolo Youth Cup as they have defeated JI-Parana RO U20, Aster Brasil U20 and Vitoria U20 to reach the 2nd Round. Last season their Sao Paolo Youth Cup adventure ended in the 2nd round.SKA Brasil U20's previous match was a Sao Paolo Youth Cup game also played at home, ending 2-0 versus Vitoria U20. The home side hope to to repeat that performance.
Before that fixture, a home win against Aster Brasil U20 in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.
Oeste U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Internacional U20, Rosario Central U20 and Fluminense PI U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Oeste's mission in Sao Paolo Youth Cup last season failed in the quarter-finals.Oeste U20 delivered a 0-0 draw playing at home against Internacional U20 in their previous game; a Sao Paolo Youth Cup duel.
A home win as expected against Rosario Central U20 preceding that, in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. So, this is expected to be a close game, an even contest. Looking at earlier matches with Oeste U20 playing away and similar expectations, we found 5 relevant matches. Results were {1 Oeste U20 wins}, 2 draws and 2 defeats.
Head 2 Head
SKA Brasil U20-Oeste U20 H2H statistics last two meetings regardless of arena: Brasil one win, Oeste U20 one win, zero draws. one of these two matches had three or more goals (over 2,5).
SKA Brasil U20 missing players
Oeste U20 missing players
| SKA Brasil U20 | Oeste U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 14 | Played | P | 11 | 25 | ||
| 12 | 9 | Won | W | 2 | 11 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Drew | D | 2 | 5 | ||
| 8 | 3 | Lost | L | 7 | 9 | ||
| 32 | 21 | Scored | S | 7 | 38 | ||
| 18 | 9 | Conceded | C | 16 | 28 | ||
| 88% | 86% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 91% | 88% | ||
| 60% | 64% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 64% | 56% | ||
| 40% | 43% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 18% | 36% | ||
| 8% | 14% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 9% | 32% | ||
| 4% | 7% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 9% | 24% | ||
| 36% | 36% | BTTS | BTTS | 27% | 36% | ||
| 52% | 64% | Clean Sheets | C S | 27% | 40% | ||
| 24% | 14% | Failed to Score | F T | 55% | 36% | ||
| 4.6 | 5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.5 | 5.2 | ||
| 3.1 | 3.2 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.2 | 4.8 | ||
| 2.5 | 2.9 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.7 | 2.6 | ||
| 4 | 4 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 3 | ||
| 12.8 | 13.9 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 9.1 | 10.4 | ||
| 5 | 5.8 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.8 | 3.9 | ||
| 19% | 22% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 23% | 31% | ||
| 9.2 | 8.9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 9.6 | 9.2 | ||
| 3.4 | 3.3 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.3 | 3 | ||
