National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Sao Paulo U20 or América Mineiro U20 that keep their silverware dream alive.
There’s little time for restitution or working hard at the training pitch these days, with both teams having played their last game less than four days ago.
Sao Paulo U20 form and stats
Action has already taken place for Sao Paulo U20 in Sao Paolo Youth Cup as they have defeated Retro U20, CSP U20, Marilia U20 and Porto Velho EC U20 to reach the 3rd Round. Sao Paulo U20 was eliminated in the semi-finals last season in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.Sao Paulo U20's previous fixture was a Sao Paolo Youth Cup game also played at their home, finishing 1-0 versus Retro U20. The home team hope to to continue in that form.
In the game before, a strong away victory at Marilia U20. A Sao Paolo Youth Cup match.
América Mineiro U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated VOCEM U20, Ponte Preta U20, Retro U20 and CSP U20 in order to reach 3rd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. América was sent out of Sao Paolo Youth Cup in the semi-finals last season.The club members enjoyed América Mineiro U20's previous game versus CSP U20, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup win (3-0) played at home.
Previously, the Sao Paolo Youth Cup win away at VOCEM U20.
Head 2 Head
Head-2-head stats last four meetings: two - zero - two (Sao Paulo U20 wins - draws - América Mineiro U20 wins). As for goals, four matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), zero had two or less.
Sao Paulo U20 missing players
América Mineiro U20 missing players
| Sao Paulo U20 | América Mineiro U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 16 | 11 | Won | W | 7 | 16 | ||
| 4 | 0 | Drew | D | 2 | 3 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Lost | L | 4 | 6 | ||
| 49 | 30 | Scored | S | 23 | 48 | ||
| 20 | 10 | Conceded | C | 11 | 18 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 92% | 96% | ||
| 68% | 69% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 69% | 72% | ||
| 56% | 69% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 38% | 48% | ||
| 32% | 38% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 31% | 32% | ||
| 20% | 23% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 15% | 8% | ||
| 40% | 38% | BTTS | BTTS | 31% | 28% | ||
| 48% | 54% | Clean Sheets | C S | 54% | 56% | ||
| 16% | 8% | Failed to Score | F T | 23% | 20% | ||
| 6.1 | 6.9 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 7.5 | 7.4 | ||
| 4 | 3 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 3.4 | 3.1 | ||
| 2.8 | 2.7 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.3 | 1.6 | ||
| 3 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 2 | ||
| 12.6 | 14.6 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 12.5 | 15.2 | ||
| 5.7 | 6.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5.3 | 6 | ||
| 33% | 35% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 36% | 33% | ||
| 10 | 8.5 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 8.8 | 8.2 | ||
| 3.8 | 3.5 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.7 | 3.3 | ||
