Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Remo U20 & Fortaleza U20 face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for Remo and Fortaleza U20.
Remo U20 form and stats
Remo U20 have reached this Sao Paolo Youth Cup stage through battling and winning against Fortaleza U20, Juventus U20, Sao Caetano U20 and Nacional SP U20. Remo U20 participated in Sao Paolo Youth Cup the last season, where they reached the group stage.Remo U20's previous fixture was a Sao Paolo Youth Cup game also played at their home, ending 1-0 vs Nacional SP U20. The home team hope to to repeat that performance.
A 1-1 scoreline against Sao Caetano U20 before that one, played at home in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.
Fortaleza U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated XV de Piracicaba U20, Juventus U20, Remo U20 and Sao Caetano U20 in order to reach 3rd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. They also participated in Sao Paolo Youth Cup last season. This ended in the 2nd round.Two trips in a row for Fortaleza, whose boss could celebrate last time after the Sao Paolo Youth Cup win against XV de Piracicaba U20.
Previously, the Sao Paolo Youth Cup win away at Juventus U20.
Head 2 Head
The sides have faced each other already this season, with the result Fortaleza U20 - Remo U20 0-1 written in the official records.
Remo U20 missing players
Fortaleza U20 missing players
| Remo U20 | Fortaleza U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 18 | 9 | Won | W | 5 | 9 | ||
| 3 | 2 | Drew | D | 3 | 7 | ||
| 4 | 2 | Lost | L | 5 | 9 | ||
| 73 | 30 | Scored | S | 14 | 40 | ||
| 25 | 12 | Conceded | C | 21 | 37 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 92% | 96% | ||
| 88% | 85% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 92% | 84% | ||
| 72% | 69% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 46% | 48% | ||
| 48% | 38% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 23% | 24% | ||
| 28% | 23% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 15% | 20% | ||
| 48% | 46% | BTTS | BTTS | 46% | 52% | ||
| 44% | 46% | Clean Sheets | C S | 31% | 24% | ||
| 8% | 8% | Failed to Score | F T | 31% | 28% | ||
| 2.4 | 3 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5 | 5.8 | ||
| 5 | 3.2 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4 | 3.9 | ||
| 3.8 | 3 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 3.7 | 3.4 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 2 | ||
| 12.1 | 14.8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11.6 | 12.1 | ||
| 4.9 | 5.8 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.1 | 4.9 | ||
| 38% | 31% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 24% | 23% | ||
| 12.9 | 13 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10.6 | 9.4 | ||
| 4.5 | 3.8 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.5 | 4.1 | ||
