National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Osasco Audax U20 or Vasco U20 that keep their silverware dream alive.
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for Osasco Audax U20 and Vasco U20.
Osasco Audax U20 form and stats
Action has already taken place for Osasco in Sao Paolo Youth Cup as they have defeated Camacariense U20, Santo Andre U20, SKA Brasil U20 and Joinville U20 to reach the 3rd Round. Osasco Audax U20 was eliminated in the group stage last season in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.2W-1D-1L is the hard facts regardless of venue in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup for Osasco Audax U20.
A draw after 90 minutes last time out for Osasco Audax U20, who played 0-0 against SKA Brasil U20 (after extra-time, 5-3 on penalties). That match was also played at this venue (Estádio Municipal Prefeito José Liberatti).
Ahead of that match, Osasco Audax U20 lost 0-1 at home to Joinville U20.Vasco U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Lagarto U20, SKA Brasil U20, Rio Claro SP U20 and Joinville U20 in order to reach 3rd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup.The mentioned statistics is only from the league, looking at the Sao Paolo Youth Cup stats, they have 4 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses both home and away.
Vasco U20 won their last game, 4-0 versus Joinville U20 played at home. As mentioned above, Vasco U20 was the only team on the pitch versus Joinville U20 in their previous game, winning 4-0. This could be a tougher task.
Preceding that game was the away Sao Paolo Youth Cup victory against SKA Brasil U20 with the score of 2-1.Head 2 Head
Osasco Audax U20 missing players
Vasco U20 missing players
| Osasco Audax U20 | Vasco U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 15 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 16 | 11 | Won | W | 7 | 16 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Drew | D | 2 | 3 | ||
| 4 | 2 | Lost | L | 4 | 6 | ||
| 52 | 29 | Scored | S | 33 | 68 | ||
| 19 | 8 | Conceded | C | 17 | 28 | ||
| 88% | 87% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 76% | 67% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 96% | ||
| 48% | 40% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 69% | 80% | ||
| 28% | 20% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 31% | 48% | ||
| 16% | 13% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 23% | 24% | ||
| 44% | 27% | BTTS | BTTS | 38% | 40% | ||
| 44% | 60% | Clean Sheets | C S | 38% | 48% | ||
| 24% | 27% | Failed to Score | F T | 23% | 12% | ||
| 5.7 | 5.1 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 7.1 | 7 | ||
| 4.2 | 3.9 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4 | 4.5 | ||
| 1.5 | 1.7 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.2 | 2.5 | ||
| 2 | 2 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 2 | ||
| 13.4 | 12.7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 15 | 14.9 | ||
| 5.5 | 5.3 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 6.5 | 6.5 | ||
| 39% | 37% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 38% | 41% | ||
| 10.3 | 9.5 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 8.7 | 8.4 | ||
| 3.6 | 3.1 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.7 | 3.4 | ||
