Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Novorizontino U20 & Gremio U20 face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
There’s little time for restitution or working hard at the training pitch these days, with both teams having played their last game less than four days ago.
Novorizontino U20 form and stats
Novorizontino U20 have reached this Sao Paolo Youth Cup stage through battling and winning against Santa Cruz U20, Castanhal U20, Uniao Iacanga U20 and Uniao ABC U20. Novorizontino was eliminated in the 2nd round last season in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.4W-0D-0L is the hard facts regardless of venue in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup for Novorizontino U20.
Novorizontino U20's previous game was a Sao Paolo Youth Cup match also played at home, ending 2-1 versus Castanhal U20. The home side are looking to build on that result.
Before that match, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup win away at Uniao ABC U20.Gremio U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Mixto U20, Santa Cruz U20, XV de Jau U20 and Castanhal U20 in order to reach 3rd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Gremio U20's mission in Sao Paolo Youth Cup last season failed in the final.When we have look at the Sao Paolo Youth Cup statistics, we find 3W-0D-1L. This is both home and away.
Impressive finishing secured the home win 2-0 against Santa Cruz U20 in their previous game.
It was a Sao Paolo Youth Cup defeat before that one as the away game against XV de Jau U20 wasn't a success with a 0-1 loss.Head 2 Head
Novorizontino U20 missing players
Gremio U20 missing players
| Novorizontino U20 | Gremio U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 15 | 7 | Won | W | 5 | 12 | ||
| 6 | 5 | Drew | D | 3 | 7 | ||
| 4 | 1 | Lost | L | 4 | 6 | ||
| 72 | 34 | Scored | S | 29 | 58 | ||
| 27 | 15 | Conceded | C | 22 | 32 | ||
| 96% | 92% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 92% | ||
| 92% | 92% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 83% | 84% | ||
| 72% | 69% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 67% | 56% | ||
| 48% | 46% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 67% | 44% | ||
| 36% | 31% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 67% | 40% | ||
| 72% | 85% | BTTS | BTTS | 75% | 52% | ||
| 20% | 8% | Clean Sheets | C S | 17% | 40% | ||
| 12% | 15% | Failed to Score | F T | 8% | 16% | ||
| 5.8 | 6.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 6.2 | 6.6 | ||
| 4 | 3.7 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4.4 | 3.7 | ||
| 1.7 | 1.4 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 3 | 2.6 | ||
| 5 | 3 | Red cards | R C | 4 | 6 | ||
| 14.3 | 14.5 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 13.8 | 16.9 | ||
| 6 | 5.8 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5 | 6.6 | ||
| 48% | 45% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 40% | 37% | ||
| 8.8 | 7.9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 9.1 | 8.6 | ||
| 4 | 3.9 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.9 | 3.8 | ||
