National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Nova Iguaçu U20 or Ferroviária U20 that keep their silverware dream alive.
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for Nova Iguaçu U20 and Ferroviária U20.
Nova Iguaçu U20 form and stats
Nova Iguaçu U20 have reached this Sao Paolo Youth Cup stage through battling and winning against Chapadinha U20, Criciuma U20 and Comercial U20. Nova Iguaçu U20 was eliminated in the group stage last season in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.This match is a Sao Paolo Youth Cup match, and the hometeam has the total statistics 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses in this competition.
The home team returns to Estádio Jardim Martins after being equal after 90 minutes with Chapadinha U20 on their last time out; the Sao Paolo Youth Cup game ended 1-1.
Before that, Iguaçu had a Sao Paolo Youth Cup home game versus Criciuma U20 which ended with a victory 1-0.Ferroviária U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Operario PR U20, Santos U20 and Rondoniense U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Ferroviária U20 was sent out of Sao Paolo Youth Cup in the 2nd round last season.When we have look at the Sao Paolo Youth Cup statistics, we find 2W-0D-1L. This is both home and away.
Ferroviária U20's previous game was their home loss versus Santos U20 (0-2).
Before that, Ferroviária U20 secured a home win against Operario PR U20 with the score 2-0.Head 2 Head
Nova Iguaçu U20 missing players
Ferroviária U20 missing players
| Nova Iguaçu U20 | Ferroviária U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 11 | 25 | ||
| 11 | 8 | Won | W | 7 | 17 | ||
| 8 | 3 | Drew | D | 1 | 4 | ||
| 6 | 2 | Lost | L | 3 | 4 | ||
| 28 | 18 | Scored | S | 19 | 54 | ||
| 20 | 7 | Conceded | C | 8 | 17 | ||
| 84% | 85% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 60% | 46% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 73% | 72% | ||
| 36% | 38% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 45% | 44% | ||
| 4% | 8% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 9% | 28% | ||
| 4% | 8% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 9% | 20% | ||
| 28% | 23% | BTTS | BTTS | 36% | 32% | ||
| 48% | 62% | Clean Sheets | C S | 45% | 56% | ||
| 40% | 31% | Failed to Score | F T | 18% | 12% | ||
| 5.3 | 5.4 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.5 | 5.5 | ||
| 4.5 | 4.6 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4 | 3.9 | ||
| 2.7 | 3 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.5 | 1.8 | ||
| 2 | 2 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 2 | ||
| 7.6 | 5.5 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11.5 | 11.8 | ||
| 2.6 | 2 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.9 | 5.4 | ||
| 35% | 55% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 35% | 41% | ||
| 7.9 | 6.9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10.4 | 10.4 | ||
| 3 | 1.9 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.7 | 3.8 | ||
