National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Mirassol U20 or Atletico-MG U20 that keep their silverware dream alive.
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for Mirassol and Atletico-MG U20.
Mirassol U20 form and stats
Action has already taken place for Mirassol U20 in Sao Paolo Youth Cup as they have defeated Confianca U20, Taguatinga U20 and Sport Recife U20 to reach the 2nd Round. Mirassol U20 participated in Sao Paolo Youth Cup the last season, where they reached the 8th finals.This match is a Sao Paolo Youth Cup match, and the hometeam has the total statistics 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses in this competition.
Mirassol U20's last game was hosting Sport Recife U20 and winning 3-2.
Previous to that game, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup home match hosting Confianca U20 in a game that was won 7-0.Atletico-MG U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Linense U20, Andira U20 and Desportiva Alianca U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Last season their Sao Paolo Youth Cup adventure ended in the 8th finals.Total Sao Paolo Youth Cup statistics for Atletico-MG U20: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss.
It might be tough going out on the road again for Atletico-MG, facing their second straight away game. Especially as the previous game, ended with a defeat 0-1 versus Linense U20.
Preceding that game was the away Sao Paolo Youth Cup victory against Andira U20 with the score of 1-0.Head 2 Head
Mirassol U20 missing players
Atletico-MG U20 missing players
| Mirassol U20 | Atletico-MG U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 14 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 18 | 11 | Won | W | 5 | 15 | ||
| 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 4 | 4 | ||
| 6 | 3 | Lost | L | 3 | 6 | ||
| 59 | 35 | Scored | S | 18 | 46 | ||
| 22 | 9 | Conceded | C | 11 | 19 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 83% | 92% | ||
| 80% | 64% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 58% | 60% | ||
| 60% | 50% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 42% | 44% | ||
| 36% | 36% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 28% | ||
| 32% | 36% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 17% | 16% | ||
| 44% | 36% | BTTS | BTTS | 42% | 36% | ||
| 44% | 50% | Clean Sheets | C S | 50% | 48% | ||
| 12% | 14% | Failed to Score | F T | 25% | 24% | ||
| 5 | 4.8 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.3 | 4.9 | ||
| 3 | 3.6 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4.5 | 4.4 | ||
| 1.8 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.8 | 2.6 | ||
| 2 | 2 | Red cards | R C | 3 | 3 | ||
| 14.6 | 16.8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11.4 | 10.5 | ||
| 6.6 | 7.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5 | 4.5 | ||
| 40% | 38% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 30% | 40% | ||
| 8.6 | 9.4 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 8.9 | 8.5 | ||
| 3.9 | 3.9 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.7 | 3 | ||