Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Londrina U20 & São Caetano U20 face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
It's no vacation for neither Londrina nor São Caetano U20 as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Londrina U20 form and stats
Action has already taken place for Londrina U20 in Sao Paolo Youth Cup as they have defeated Sao Bento U20, Sao Bernardo U20 and Aster Brasil U20 to reach the 2nd Round. Londrina U20 participated in Sao Paolo Youth Cup the last season, where they reached the 8th finals.On the other hand, in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup, Londrina U20 has performed like this (both home and away): 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss.
Happy days for Londrina in their previous game, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup match away at Sao Bernardo U20 that ended with a 4-1 victory.
A strong away win before that one, visiting Sao Bento U20 and winning 2-1.São Caetano U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated CSE U20, Perilima U20 and Sao Paulo U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. São Caetano U20's mission in Sao Paolo Youth Cup last season failed in the 2nd round.Total Sao Paolo Youth Cup statistics for São Caetano U20: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss.
This game can not go any worse than the last one, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup home defeat versus Sao Paulo U20 with 1-2 on the scoreboard.
Prior to that match, a home win 2-0 against CSE U20 in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.Head 2 Head
Londrina U20 missing players
São Caetano U20 missing players
| Londrina U20 | São Caetano U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 12 | 5 | Won | W | 4 | 8 | ||
| 8 | 6 | Drew | D | 5 | 9 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Lost | L | 3 | 8 | ||
| 50 | 24 | Scored | S | 15 | 31 | ||
| 35 | 17 | Conceded | C | 14 | 30 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 92% | 92% | ||
| 92% | 92% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 83% | 76% | ||
| 68% | 62% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 42% | 48% | ||
| 40% | 38% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 28% | ||
| 28% | 15% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | ||
| 72% | 69% | BTTS | BTTS | 67% | 56% | ||
| 24% | 23% | Clean Sheets | C S | 8% | 20% | ||
| 4% | 8% | Failed to Score | F T | 33% | 32% | ||
| 5.9 | 6.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.2 | 4.7 | ||
| 5.1 | 5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.2 | 4.8 | ||
| 1.4 | 1.2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.4 | 2.2 | ||
| 2 | 2 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 4 | ||
| 10.3 | 9.9 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 9.5 | 9.8 | ||
| 5 | 4.9 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3.6 | 3.8 | ||
| 41% | 37% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 38% | 34% | ||
| 10.3 | 9.1 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 8.7 | 8.8 | ||
| 4.5 | 4.2 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.5 | 3.7 | ||
