Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Internacional U20 & Flamengo SP U20 face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
It's no vacation for neither Internacional U20 nor Flamengo SP U20 as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Internacional U20 form and stats
Internacional U20 have reached this Sao Paolo Youth Cup stage through battling and winning against Portuguesa U20, Sao Raimundo RR U20 and Uniao Mogi U20.On the other hand, in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup, Internacional U20 has performed like this (both home and away): 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses.
It's back home for Internacional U20, who return with a good feeling about themselves after beating Uniao Mogi U20 away with the result 3-0.
Before that match, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup win away at Portuguesa U20.Flamengo SP U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Santana U20, Guarulhos U20 and Avaí U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Flamengo was sent out of Sao Paolo Youth Cup in the 2nd round last season.When we have look at the Sao Paolo Youth Cup statistics, we find 1W-2D-0L. This is both home and away.
Flamengo SP U20 played 1-1 against Avaí U20 in their previous match.
That result followed a home victory 3-0 versus Santana U20 in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.Head 2 Head
Internacional U20 missing players
Flamengo SP U20 missing players
| Internacional U20 | Flamengo SP U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 14 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 18 | 10 | Won | W | 3 | 8 | ||
| 6 | 3 | Drew | D | 4 | 6 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lost | L | 6 | 11 | ||
| 64 | 37 | Scored | S | 12 | 25 | ||
| 14 | 8 | Conceded | C | 19 | 34 | ||
| 92% | 86% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 92% | 92% | ||
| 72% | 71% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 69% | 64% | ||
| 56% | 57% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 54% | 52% | ||
| 36% | 36% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 15% | 20% | ||
| 28% | 29% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 8% | 8% | ||
| 36% | 36% | BTTS | BTTS | 46% | 44% | ||
| 60% | 57% | Clean Sheets | C S | 23% | 28% | ||
| 12% | 21% | Failed to Score | F T | 38% | 36% | ||
| 4.2 | 4.7 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.2 | 5.9 | ||
| 4.8 | 4.9 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.6 | 4.9 | ||
| 1.5 | 1.5 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.6 | 2.3 | ||
| 3 | 2 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 2 | ||
| 12.2 | 13.6 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 9.3 | 10.4 | ||
| 4.9 | 5.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3.7 | 4.3 | ||
| 41% | 37% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 17% | 21% | ||
| 9.1 | 8.7 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 12.7 | 11.7 | ||
| 3.1 | 3.1 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.4 | 4.1 | ||
