Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Ibrachina U20 & Oeste U20 face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
There’s little time for restitution or working hard at the training pitch these days, with both teams having played their last game less than four days ago.
Ibrachina U20 form and stats
This is not the first game this season in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup for Ibrachina U20, as the manager led his troops to eliminate Inter Limeira U20, Serranense U20 and Nautico U20, and reach the 2nd Round.On the other hand, in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup, Ibrachina U20 has performed like this (both home and away): 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses.
Ibrachina U20's last game was hosting Nautico U20 and winning 2-0.
Previous to that game, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup home match hosting Serranense U20 in a game that was won 3-0.Oeste U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Floresta CE U20, Flamengo RJ U20 and Forte U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Last season their Sao Paolo Youth Cup adventure ended in the semi-finals.When we have look at the Sao Paolo Youth Cup statistics, we find 2W-1D-0L. This is both home and away.
Oeste's last game was the home draw against Flamengo RJ U20 (3-3). Drawing 3-3 against Flamengo RJ U20 after 90 minutes last time out was very disappointing after leading the match 3-0. Their manager needs to evaluate why the team couldn't defend their result. As you can tell from the result, the match against Flamengo RJ U20 was as crazy as a clown in a village circus. Great fun for the neutral supporter with 6 goals, will the fun continue today?
A home win before that, celebrating 6-1 vs Forte U20.Head 2 Head
Ibrachina U20 missing players
Oeste U20 missing players
| Ibrachina U20 | Oeste U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 13 | 8 | Played | P | 11 | 25 | ||
| 6 | 6 | Won | W | 4 | 13 | ||
| 2 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 5 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Lost | L | 6 | 7 | ||
| 21 | 18 | Scored | S | 14 | 49 | ||
| 18 | 10 | Conceded | C | 20 | 34 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 77% | 88% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 92% | ||
| 62% | 75% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 64% | 60% | ||
| 31% | 38% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 36% | 48% | ||
| 15% | 25% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 9% | 20% | ||
| 54% | 62% | BTTS | BTTS | 55% | 64% | ||
| 23% | 38% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 16% | ||
| 23% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 45% | 20% | ||
| 3.8 | 3.7 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.6 | 5.2 | ||
| 5.2 | 6 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 7.2 | 6.5 | ||
| 2.2 | 2.4 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.7 | 1.9 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 2 | ||
| 10.2 | 11.7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 9.8 | 11.9 | ||
| 4 | 4.9 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.2 | 5.1 | ||
| 50% | 50% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 30% | 37% | ||
| 10.9 | 11.7 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 11.2 | 10.9 | ||
| 4.7 | 4.6 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4 | 3.6 | ||
