Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Fluminense U20 & Francana U20 face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for Fluminense U20 and Francana U20.
Fluminense U20 form and stats
Fluminense U20 have not come this way in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup without some hard work on the way, more precisely defeating Matonense U20, Jacuipense U20 and Fast Clube U20. Last season, Fluminense U20's Sao Paolo Youth Cup journey ended in the 2nd round.On the other hand, in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup, Fluminense U20 has performed like this (both home and away): 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses.
Happy days for Fluminense U20 in their previous game, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup match away at Matonense U20 that ended with a 3-2 victory.
In the game before, an away victory in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup match versus Fast Clube U20 with a 3-0 scoreline.It would be a shock if the hosts fail to win this game. Let's see how Fluminense have performed as huge favourites like they are today: six games found in the database showing four Fluminense U20 wins, one draw and one defeat.
Francana U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Ponte Preta U20, Juventude U20 and Confianca PB U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Francana U20's mission in Sao Paolo Youth Cup last season failed in the 2nd round.The mentioned statistics is only from the league, looking at the Sao Paolo Youth Cup stats, they have 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses both home and away.
Francana U20's last game was the home draw against Juventude U20 (1-1).
Before that, Francana U20 secured a home win against Confianca PB U20 with the score 2-0.Head 2 Head
Fluminense U20 missing players
Francana U20 missing players
| Fluminense U20 | Francana U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 1 | 12 | ||
| 14 | 7 | Won | W | 0 | 3 | ||
| 4 | 3 | Drew | D | 1 | 5 | ||
| 7 | 2 | Lost | L | 0 | 4 | ||
| 44 | 21 | Scored | S | 2 | 14 | ||
| 27 | 10 | Conceded | C | 2 | 15 | ||
| 96% | 92% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 92% | ||
| 72% | 67% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 83% | ||
| 52% | 42% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 50% | ||
| 32% | 25% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 100% | 17% | ||
| 20% | 17% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | ||
| 48% | 42% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 75% | ||
| 40% | 50% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 25% | ||
| 16% | 17% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 8% | ||
| 4.5 | 4.4 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3 | 3.8 | ||
| 5.5 | 6.1 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 8 | 6.4 | ||
| 2.4 | 2.1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 5 | 2.9 | ||
| 3 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9.5 | 9.8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 13 | 10.7 | ||
| 4.2 | 4.6 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3 | 3.8 | ||
| 45% | 41% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 67% | 31% | ||
| 11.3 | 13 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 24 | 15 | ||
| 4.7 | 5.1 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 8 | 5.6 | ||
