National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Chapecoense-SC U20 or Mirassol U20 that keep their silverware dream alive.
It's no vacation for neither Chapecoense-SC U20 nor Mirassol U20 as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Chapecoense-SC U20 form and stats
Action has already taken place for Chapecoense-SC in Sao Paolo Youth Cup as they have defeated Mirassol U20, Inter de Minas U20, Tanabi SP U20 and Uniao ABC U20 to reach the 3rd Round. Last season their Sao Paolo Youth Cup adventure ended in the 3rd round.Chapecoense-SC U20 are returning here after guesting Tanabi SP U20 in a Sao Paolo Youth Cup game and winning with a 1-0 scoreline.
Before that match, a defeat in the away fixture against Mirassol U20 in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup.
Mirassol U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Inter de Minas U20, Chapecoense-SC U20, Real Ariquemes U20 and Uniao ABC U20 in order to reach 3rd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. They also participated in Sao Paolo Youth Cup last season. This ended in the quarter-finals.Mirassol U20 delivered a 0-0 draw playing at home against Real Ariquemes U20 in their previous game; a Sao Paolo Youth Cup duel.
Before that one, the victory at home against Chapecoense-SC U20 in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup (1-0). So, this is expected to be a close game, an even contest. Looking at earlier matches with Mirassol U20 playing away and similar expectations, we found 5 relevant matches. Results were {1 Mirassol U20 wins}, 0 draws and 4 defeats.
Head 2 Head
Mirassol U20 - Chapecoense-SC 1-0 was the end result in these sides' latest head-to-head match, played this season.
Chapecoense-SC U20 missing players
Mirassol U20 missing players
| Chapecoense-SC U20 | Mirassol U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 11 | 25 | ||
| 16 | 9 | Won | W | 4 | 11 | ||
| 4 | 0 | Drew | D | 4 | 7 | ||
| 5 | 3 | Lost | L | 3 | 7 | ||
| 51 | 31 | Scored | S | 13 | 39 | ||
| 29 | 13 | Conceded | C | 13 | 28 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 91% | 92% | ||
| 68% | 75% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 73% | 76% | ||
| 60% | 75% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 36% | 44% | ||
| 44% | 50% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 18% | 32% | ||
| 36% | 50% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 9% | 12% | ||
| 56% | 58% | BTTS | BTTS | 45% | 40% | ||
| 32% | 33% | Clean Sheets | C S | 36% | 40% | ||
| 16% | 8% | Failed to Score | F T | 27% | 28% | ||
| 4.3 | 5.6 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 6.3 | 5.6 | ||
| 5 | 5.3 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 3.2 | 3.9 | ||
| 1.7 | 1.7 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.9 | 1.9 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 5 | ||
| 12.3 | 15.7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 15.8 | 15 | ||
| 5.6 | 7.7 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5.8 | 6.3 | ||
| 27% | 26% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 23% | 22% | ||
| 12.7 | 12.9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10.2 | 11 | ||
| 3.8 | 3.7 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.9 | 4.8 | ||
