Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Botafogo U20 & São José PA U20 face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
It's no vacation for neither Botafogo U20 nor São José PA U20 as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Botafogo U20 form and stats
Botafogo have not come this way in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup without some hard work on the way, more precisely defeating Taubaté U20, Aparecidense U20, São José PA U20 and Petrolina U20. Last season their Sao Paolo Youth Cup adventure ended in the 2nd round.On the other hand, in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup, Botafogo U20 has performed like this (both home and away): 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss.
The spoils were shared in Botafogo U20's previous game, also at home. Visiting São José PA U20 travelled back with a draw after a 0-0 scoreline.
Before that match, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup win away at Taubaté U20.São José PA U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated XV de Piracicaba U20, Botafogo U20, Manthiqueira U20 and Vitoria U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. They also participated in Sao Paolo Youth Cup last season. This ended in the group stage.When we have look at the Sao Paolo Youth Cup statistics, we find 2W-1D-1L. This is both home and away.
São José PA U20 has to pack their bags again for the second away game in a row. Last time they traveled to Botafogo U20 for a Sao Paolo Youth Cup game that ended a draw (0-0).
A 2-3 loss hosting XV de Piracicaba U20 before that.Head 2 Head
Botafogo U20-São José PA U20 H2H statistics last two meetings regardless of arena: Botafogo U20 one win, São José PA U20 zero wins, one draw. zero of these two matches had three or more goals (over 2,5).Botafogo U20 missing players
São José PA U20 missing players
| Botafogo U20 | São José PA U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 14 | 25 | ||
| 9 | 6 | Won | W | 8 | 13 | ||
| 9 | 5 | Drew | D | 3 | 7 | ||
| 7 | 2 | Lost | L | 3 | 5 | ||
| 34 | 18 | Scored | S | 26 | 48 | ||
| 31 | 12 | Conceded | C | 16 | 29 | ||
| 88% | 85% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 86% | 92% | ||
| 72% | 62% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 71% | 80% | ||
| 48% | 46% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 64% | 60% | ||
| 32% | 23% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 50% | 48% | ||
| 20% | 15% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 21% | 24% | ||
| 52% | 46% | BTTS | BTTS | 36% | 48% | ||
| 32% | 46% | Clean Sheets | C S | 50% | 40% | ||
| 28% | 23% | Failed to Score | F T | 29% | 20% | ||
| 5.2 | 5.8 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.4 | 4.2 | ||
| 5.5 | 4.5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 6 | 5.1 | ||
| 1.8 | 1.7 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.8 | 2.2 | ||
| 2 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 3 | ||
| 12.1 | 12.7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11 | 11.4 | ||
| 5.1 | 5.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5.2 | 4.9 | ||
| 29% | 25% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 38% | 37% | ||
| 10.7 | 10.2 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 12.1 | 11.9 | ||
| 5.2 | 4.9 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.9 | 5.1 | ||
