National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Atletico-MG U20 or Nova Iguaçu U20 that keep their silverware dream alive.
It's no vacation for neither Atletico-MG U20 nor Nova Iguaçu U20 as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Atletico-MG U20 form and stats
Atletico-MG have not come this way in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup without some hard work on the way, more precisely defeating Mixto U20, Galvez U20 and Água Santa U20. Last season their Sao Paolo Youth Cup adventure ended in the 2nd round.Atletico-MG U20 are returning here after visiting Água Santa U20 in a Sao Paolo Youth Cup match and winning with a 4-2 scoreline.
Before that game, a strong away win at Mixto U20. A Sao Paolo Youth Cup game. The home team are expected to win this game about three out of four times, according to the bookmaker odds. When checking the database for Atletico-MG U20 home games with this odds we find 6 games with a similar winning chance. Resulting in 6 wins, 0 draws and 0 defeats. Looking at the victories, 4 matches were won by at least two goals.
Nova Iguaçu U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Maua U20, Vila Nova U20 and Mauaense U20 in order to reach 2nd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Iguaçu was sent out of Sao Paolo Youth Cup in the 2nd round last season.The supporters enjoyed Nova Iguaçu U20's previous game versus Mauaense U20, a Sao Paolo Youth Cup win (3-0) played at home.
Ahead of that, the Sao Paolo Youth Cup victory away at Maua U20. We have done a similar check as we did with the hometeam, looking up recent matches where Iguaçu played away with similar odds. This revealed 4 games. The visitors overcame the odds to win 0 times, 0 were draws and the home team won as expected 4 times.
Head 2 Head
Atletico-MG U20 missing players
Nova Iguaçu U20 missing players
| Atletico-MG U20 | Nova Iguaçu U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 11 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 15 | 7 | Won | W | 4 | 10 | ||
| 8 | 4 | Drew | D | 2 | 8 | ||
| 2 | 0 | Lost | L | 6 | 7 | ||
| 58 | 24 | Scored | S | 12 | 35 | ||
| 18 | 4 | Conceded | C | 18 | 35 | ||
| 88% | 73% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 92% | 96% | ||
| 76% | 64% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 58% | 72% | ||
| 60% | 55% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 42% | 48% | ||
| 32% | 27% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 33% | 32% | ||
| 24% | 18% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 25% | 24% | ||
| 56% | 36% | BTTS | BTTS | 33% | 52% | ||
| 36% | 64% | Clean Sheets | C S | 33% | 32% | ||
| 20% | 27% | Failed to Score | F T | 42% | 20% | ||
| 5.2 | 5.9 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.9 | 5.2 | ||
| 3.5 | 2.7 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 6.4 | 6 | ||
| 2 | 1.6 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.4 | 2.8 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 3 | ||
| 11.1 | 8.9 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11.2 | 10.3 | ||
| 4.7 | 4.1 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5.1 | 4.4 | ||
| 46% | 43% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 22% | 31% | ||
| 8.4 | 6.6 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 12.5 | 13.5 | ||
| 2.5 | 1.6 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.9 | 4.5 | ||
