Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Atlético GO U20 & Palmeiras U20 face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Sao Paolo Youth Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
There’s little time for restitution or working hard at the training pitch these days, with both teams having played their last game less than four days ago.
Atlético GO U20 form and stats
Atlético GO U20 have reached this Sao Paolo Youth Cup stage through battling and winning against Agua Santa U20, Maua U20, Mauaense U20 and Volta Redonda U20. Atlético GO U20 participated in Sao Paolo Youth Cup the last season, where they reached the 3rd round.3W-1D-0L is the hard facts regardless of venue in the Sao Paolo Youth Cup for Atlético GO U20.
Atlético's previous game was a Sao Paolo Youth Cup match also played at home, ending 2-1 versus Agua Santa U20. The home side are looking to build on that result.
Preceding that game was the away draw at Maua U20 that finished 0-0.Palmeiras U20 form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Agua Santa U20, ASSU U20, Maua U20 and Real Ariquemes U20 in order to reach 3rd round of Sao Paolo Youth Cup. Last season their Sao Paolo Youth Cup adventure ended in the 3rd round.When we have look at the Sao Paolo Youth Cup statistics, we find 3W-1D-0L. This is both home and away.
Palmeiras U20 go into this game after a win, the home game against Maua U20 that ended 4-0. As mentioned above, Palmeiras U20 was the only team on the pitch versus Maua U20 in their previous game, winning 4-0. This could be a tougher task.
Before that, Palmeiras U20 travelled to Agua Santa U20 and returned home with a draw after the Sao Paolo Youth Cup game finished 1-1.Head 2 Head
Atlético GO U20 missing players
Palmeiras U20 missing players
| Atlético GO U20 | Palmeiras U20 | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 10 | 7 | Won | W | 8 | 16 | ||
| 5 | 3 | Drew | D | 3 | 8 | ||
| 10 | 2 | Lost | L | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 18 | Scored | S | 27 | 71 | ||
| 32 | 10 | Conceded | C | 8 | 18 | ||
| 88% | 83% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 96% | ||
| 68% | 67% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 92% | 88% | ||
| 52% | 42% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 48% | ||
| 28% | 25% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 36% | ||
| 16% | 17% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 17% | 28% | ||
| 48% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 58% | 56% | ||
| 32% | 50% | Clean Sheets | C S | 42% | 44% | ||
| 32% | 17% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 4% | ||
| 5.4 | 4.8 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 6.9 | 6.3 | ||
| 5 | 4.5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4.1 | 3.7 | ||
| 2 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.4 | 2 | ||
| 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 3 | ||
| 8 | 7.8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11.2 | 11.7 | ||
| 3 | 2.8 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5.1 | 5.9 | ||
| 33% | 45% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 46% | 45% | ||
| 10 | 10.2 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 7.7 | 8.7 | ||
| 4.5 | 4.5 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 2.9 | 3.5 | ||
