National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's CSA or Remo that keep their silverware dream alive.
CSA have less rest than Remo in this fixture, as the hosts were involved in a Copa do Nordeste game only three days ago. At least it's nice to return home after that away game at Sampaio Corrêa.
These teams have little in common geographically as Remo have to travel 2100 kilometers to reach their opponents. The trip home will be especially long if the match ends in defeat.
CSA form and stats
CSA have not come this way in the Copa do Brasil without some hard work on the way, more precisely defeating Guarany de Sobral. CSA was eliminated in the 1st round last season in the Copa do Brasil.In general it's been a long time since CSA tasted defeat here at Estádio Universitário da UFAL, as they have taken at least one point from their last 13 home games in the league.
CSA drew their last game, 0-0 away at Sampaio Corrêa. Ahead of that match, CSA won a home game hosting Coruripe (5-0).
Remo form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Esportivo in order to reach 2nd round of Copa do Brasil. Remo was sent out of Copa do Brasil in the 2nd round last season.Momentum is building for Remo in their away games, having won their two previous outings.
Remo delivered a 2-2 draw playing at home against Independente PA in their previous match; a Paraense game. Prior to that result Remo won their away game at Paysandu in the Paraense. The scoreline was 4-2.
Head 2 Head
H2H stats regardless of arena (last two matches): CSA one win, one draw and Remo zero victories. As for goals, zero matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), two games had two or less.CSA missing players
Remo missing players
| CSA | Remo | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 10 | 6 | Won | W | 5 | 13 | ||
| 12 | 6 | Drew | D | 3 | 5 | ||
| 3 | 0 | Lost | L | 4 | 7 | ||
| 44 | 25 | Scored | S | 17 | 42 | ||
| 21 | 7 | Conceded | C | 17 | 31 | ||
| 84% | 92% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 83% | 88% | ||
| 80% | 92% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 75% | 72% | ||
| 44% | 42% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 52% | ||
| 32% | 25% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 33% | 36% | ||
| 16% | 17% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 25% | 24% | ||
| 52% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 58% | 56% | ||
| 36% | 50% | Clean Sheets | C S | 42% | 36% | ||
| 28% | 8% | Failed to Score | F T | 17% | 20% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2.2 | 2.5 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||
| 2 | 2 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 2 | ||
| 10.2 | 11.2 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11 | 12 | ||
| 4.1 | 5.2 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.9 | 4.5 | ||
| 39% | 40% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 28% | 38% | ||