The two contenders are relishing a fine season so far and games like today could be key. Get ready for Spy - Condruzien!
- Spy have the fewest conceded goals (12) in Provincial-Namur
- Condruzien have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
There should be plenty of energy on the pitch in this game, as both sides have had time to recuperate from their last game. Let's hope both teams are ready to give it all.
Spy form and stats
The home supporters can't complain about results here at Stade des Ecureuils as Spy have scored 19 goals to get 13 points from 6 games. The overall stats in the Provincial-Namur are 4-1-1 (wins-draws-losses).
Spy shared the glory with Grand-Leez in their last match, an away game that ended all square 0-0.
The spoils were shared after 90 minutes before that, a home game that ended 0-0 versus US Dinantaise.With more than three goals on average, the attacking play of Spy is on fire here. A stunning 19 from 6 league matches. From these home matches, Spy have conceded only 5 goals.
Condruzien form and stats
3-2-1 is the win-draw-loss statistic for Condruzien in their Provincial-Namur matches away.
Condruzien are travelling after their nice 2-1 home win in the Provincial-Namur against Nismes (placed 8th).
A 1-2 defeat away at Chevetogne before that.The prediction for this game is lots of goals as Condruzien alone have scored more than three on average in their league games away (19 from 6 played). Condruzien struggle to build an impenetrable defensive wall in away matches with a total of 10 goals conceded from these games.
Head 2 Head
Stats for the previous two meetings involving these two contenders are: one win for Spy, zero draws and one win for Condruzien. Over 2,5 goals: two times; under 2,5 goals: zero games.Spy missing players
Condruzien missing players
| Spy | Condruzien | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 12 | 6 | 0 | Played | P | 1 | 6 | 12 |
| 6 | 4 | 0 | Won | W | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 28 | 19 | 0 | Scored | S | 3 | 19 | 33 |
| 12 | 5 | 0 | Conceded | C | 2 | 10 | 19 |
| 83% | 83% | 0% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 83% | 92% |
| 83% | 83% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 83% | 92% |
| 67% | 83% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 83% | 75% |
| 50% | 50% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 100% | 67% | 50% |
| 25% | 50% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 100% | 67% | 50% |
| 67% | 67% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 83% | 92% |
| 25% | 33% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 17% | 8% |
| 25% | 17% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 17% | 8% |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Condruzien have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Spy have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Spy have scored at least twice as many goals as they have conceded.
- Spy have the fewest conceded goals (12) in Provincial-Namur
- Spy have the the best goal difference (+14) at home in Provincial-Namur
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Ciney | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 8 | 29 | 33 |
| 2 | Biesme | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 34 | 16 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 18 | 28 |
| 3 | Andennais | 12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 34 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 22 |
| 4 | Spy | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 22 |
| 5 | Condruzien | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 33 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 10 | 14 | 22 |
| 6 | Loyers | 12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 22 |
| 7 | Grand-Leez | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 9 | 11 | 20 |
| 8 | Nismes | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 23 | 22 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 20 |
| 9 | Chevetogne | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 22 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 15 | 7 | 19 |
| 10 | US Dinantaise | 12 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 17 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -10 | 11 |
| 11 | Flavion-Morialme | 12 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 18 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 12 | -9 | 10 |
| 12 | Fernelmont-Hemptinne | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 25 | 36 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 19 | -11 | 10 |
| 13 | ES de la Molignee | 12 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 14 | 39 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 22 | -25 | 8 |
| 14 | Meux II | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 18 | 31 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -13 | 7 |
| 15 | Malonne | 12 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -24 | 7 |
| 16 | Beauraing | 12 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 37 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -26 | 6 |