Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Achel & De Kempen face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Belgian Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
Achel form and stats
Achel was eliminated in the 3rd round last season in the Belgian Cup.The Achel fans got no joy from their last match, a Provincial-Limburg game also here at Terrein Achel VV: A 0-4 defeat against KFC Eksel. Achel were outplayed and humiliated in their previous game, as mentioned in the paragraph above. They will need to reinstall their confidence before this one.
A Provincial-Limburg defeat was the result before that one, 0-2 away at Herderen-Millen.De Kempen form and stats
Kempen's mission in Belgian Cup last season failed in the 2nd round.The away team travel with confidence. Not since the Lille game have they lost an away game, meaning De Kempen has taken points from seven away matches in a row.
Kempen are the visiting side once again, their previous game being the 1-1 draw at Diest.
Preceding that, the 2-3 home loss versus Betekom.Head 2 Head
Achel missing players
De Kempen missing players
| Achel | De Kempen | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 15 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 9 | 6 | Won | W | 6 | 11 | ||
| 5 | 4 | Drew | D | 4 | 7 | ||
| 11 | 5 | Lost | L | 3 | 7 | ||
| 44 | 30 | Scored | S | 26 | 55 | ||
| 47 | 29 | Conceded | C | 22 | 47 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 92% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 85% | 84% | ||
| 76% | 80% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 69% | 72% | ||
| 60% | 67% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 62% | 68% | ||
| 24% | 20% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 38% | 48% | ||
| 72% | 80% | BTTS | BTTS | 85% | 84% | ||
| 20% | 13% | Clean Sheets | C S | 15% | 12% | ||
| 12% | 7% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 4% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3 | 3 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 6 | 6 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 3 | 3 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 6 | 6 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3 | 3 | ||
| 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 33% | 33% | ||